NYTimes lays bare their agenda: Make the pope quit

The NYTimes, again ignoring that experts agree that it was Ratzinger who changed the bureaucracy to allow faster removal of abusive priests, continues their witch hunt, complete with one sided "facts": although I must admit the BBC is not much better.

Today they have an editorial asking do Popes quit?

This reminds one of the many articles on why John Paul II should quit, when the NYTimes compared the church to a business with a sick CEO who should quit to let younger people take over (and of course if one is following Maureen Dowd, their choice is a feminist nun, preferably one who supports Obama's abortion campaign in the US and elsewhere, including the Philippines).

Now the "gotcha" is a letter questioning if a priest should be released from celibacy. This was routine, but the request was not by a bishop trying to laicize a young man, but to reward an abuser. Ratzinger's letter merely questions if easy laicization of priests asking to marry is a good idea, and the missing part is important: The man wanted to marry, and after he did marry, he went on abusing.

So by "laicizing" him (instead of having the bishop remove him, something different because it would carry a "headsup" that something was wrong with him) he was let lose on the public. Better to insist he go into a monastery for life...

"The calls — from some lay Catholics, bloggers, secular publications like the German magazine Der Spiegel and street protesters — "

The dirty little secret is that Der Spiegel, like the BBC and NYTimes, has an agenda (don't believe me? Look at their constant anti American smears before Obama took over to push the NWO Agenda).

As for "some lay catholics", they are the "usual suspects": the liberals who have been trying to destroy the church since Vatican II.
"street protester" ditto. The left can get out protesters with nothing else to do, since they are living off of mama's money, but when real protesters who have jobs protest as teaparty protests in the US, they are dismissed and demonized.

The press was aghast when the "John Paul II" generation was there cheering Ratzinger's election, and who they had been busy smearing for years...same here.

so now their agenda is on record.

Stalin once ridiculed the papacy: How many divisions does the pope have"...
The problem is that there are too many prophacies out there that a NWO church, similar to that of the Anglicans, will be the spirituality of the NWO and that this will result in believers being prosecuted.

I first heard this back in 1978, and a lot of it has come true...and many Catholic prophecies are similar.



So far, the prosecution is ridicule, but one waits for the court cases to start.

Of course, the last Pope who was arrested was arrested by Napoleon...

But even if Western Europe apostasizes, the third world, and Russia's Orthodoxy, will keep Christianity alive.