culture of life vs culture of death

the dubia bishops are not going away, but the Pope's minions are getting harsher and harsher with their condemnations, not to point out that certain bishops have scandalized the layfolk by pushing through a "who ever wants to receive communion, no problem". Paul, the apostle not the pope, begged to differ, but never mind.

If God doesn't intervene and soften the hearts of the PC trying to make the church into a social work factory, one can see schism.

The tipping point is divorce and the eucharist but it won't stop there.

David Virtue has a report on the latest lambasting of those bible believing Aftican bishops by those who want to push thee western elite's sexual agenda.

Idowu-Fearon is playing fictional games with himself when he says he a "messenger" and "ambassador". He's neither. What he has done is clarify, perhaps forever, that two communions now exist side by side; one will grow and the other over time will shrink and die. TEC, the ACoC and C of E all have less than one million practicing members. That's no bigger than some dioceses in Nigeria.
Archbishop Okoh has said he has no intention of pulling out of the Anglican Communion, and the reason is now obvious -- he doesn't have to. He and GAFCON own the communion. It is theirs. More than 80 percent of Anglicans are orthodox in faith and morals and most either belong to GAFCON or are sympathetic to it. There is no reason for them to leave when their patience will ultimately prevail. When GAFCON gathers in Jerusalem in 2018, it will be hard for Welby to ignore the elephant standing inside Lambeth Palace gates waiting to shoot him a trunk full of water. Hot ecclesiastical air it won't be.

the back story is that the money is pushing "Change". Money from rich Europeans who probably don't believe, or who have sexual problems and see this as a way to affirm they are not sinners.

One is reminded of Bishop Sheen's question to a priest who said he left the church because he had "theological differences". The bishop asked: "Is the theological difference blond or brunette". Nowadays, we would ask: Is the theological difference a woman or a man. (Or a cute teenaged boy, but the attraction of gays for teenaged boys is still a taboo topic in polite society, as is the tendency to multiple partners when "married").

David Warren has an essay here

In case the meaning of this arguably abstruse phrase were to cause confusion, our Captain added: “Whosover shall put away his wife and marry another, committeth adultery against her.” And then He spelt that out, in words that would be hard to misconstrue. … (O ye bishops of Malta!)
 Sin happens. This is nothing new. It has been happening for some time now; and if it’s possible to retrieve someone gone overboard, Holy Church is bound to try.

She will need some cooperation from the drowning party, however. He (she, they) need to be “accompanied” back to the yacht. The sort of gooey, slobbering sympathy that proposes to follow them to some other destination will not do.

A person floundering in the water may have no clear idea what is to be done. The person trying to rescue him must have a clear idea, however. This is something I once learnt in lifeguard class.

 one can argue that Pope Francis is merely trying to make the church more compassionate (cynically I would say he is doing this to attract the rich back to church). But what he is doing is sowing confusion in a world that needs to be told that right and wrong exist.

But never mind. Must be popular you know.

But then God does bring up fools to do the work. Gideon, anyone?

Or Father Scanlan, rest in peace, who was posted to Steubenville College to close it gently, and changed it to a Catholic university that is associated with the more vibrant academics in the church.

Or Mother Angelica, a crippled Italian cloistered nun in the Bible Belt, who told off Cardinal Mahoney and only survived because John Paul II agreed with her. Of course, Mahoney did more than denigrate the Eucharist (which she was defending): Boys, anyone?

Duterte is not Catholic, but is the popular choice over the usual (corrupt) suspects.

Trump is not Catholic, but was the popular choice over the usual (corrupt) suspects.

And Davos let Xi give a talk lamenting populism. Yup. Democracy is a bitch ain't it, when the deplorables revolt.

One wonders: Where are the Christians in all of this, and the answer is: Holding their noses and hoping for the lesser of two evils.

There are a lot of Catholic and Protestant prophecies that the church will divide, and some that say the PC church will be the anti christ church of prophecy.

But there are also prophecies that the revival will be when ordinary folks who pray stand up.

and that is already going on, from the Anglican church in American to the few bishops who hold the line.

Here in the Philippinnes, with a Francis bishop in charge of Manila, I worry. But the Protestants are picking up the pieces. Sigh.