I used to work in Boston in the late 1980's, and my kids attended schools there...when I lived there, the pro euthanasia types were pushing it in the local medical journal and in medical schools (and ostracizing those who disagreed) and we (myself and two non Catholic ethicists who taught in local medical schools) wrote to the bishop there with a "headsup" of what was going on, and got a formal letter in return. The end result was a vague "end of life" column in the diocese newspaper that was probably read by no one, which didn't make much difference since it was too vague to understand what they were talking about...
so
this makes me cynical.
Ignoring pedophiles>
No problem. They only need "treatment" and then were reassigned.
Ignoring serial sex abusers because they are heroes in the press for working with street people?
No Problem...
Ignoring gay priests and screening out orthodox men who applied to the seminaries for being believers?
No problem
Teaching 8th graders like my son that masturbation is okay?
No problem.
Ignoring the rush to euthanasia in the local medical schools, including the low grade persecution of professors who oppose it?
No problem
Ignoring the vast disappearance of people from attending mass?
No problem.
Praying and being given talks to encourage you to pray by a "non approved" visionary?
AGGGH!
One is reminded of St Teresa (the big one) who was a reformer and got in trouble and even tried by the inquisition: she asked her critics that why, with all the local problems in the church, they were so busy trying to stop women from praying.
Uh, if God is real, then prayer is dangerous.
Prayer definition: Raising one's heart and mind to God.
I find prayer hard: I tend not to emotionally "believe" much of the time, and am cynical about those who insist we need to feel the spirit to be close to god.
but then I don't emotionally believe in gravity, or in supernovas, etc. But I recognize God and gravity are "reality".
I tend toward the "social action" wing of the church, but not the "nuns on the bus" who are willing to look the other way at killing unborn babies to become politically correct.
Of course, the PC nuns hate the place: they (correctly) point out that these prayer organizations don't do "social action". Yet, as a doc who works with ordinary people, I think they are wrong because they equate doing good with approved forms of social action. This lets them overlook the everyday goodness of people struggling to raise and care for families.
As one Hindu saint told a woman who said she didn't believe in god: Your husband is god. Your children are god. in other words, caring and loving your family is one way of serving god. The catholic equivalent is the little St Theresa's "little way", of doing the duties of your daily life with love.
Take my case: I'd love to go down and care for those injured in the Visayas, but it would mean not taking care of my husband. Which is a priority? Should I have stayed in the US working as a doc in the poor Indian reservations, and placed him in a nursing home (where he would probably have died due to poor care)? Or was I right retiring early to return home with him to the Philippines, where he can be cared for by extended family?
The point is that praying is not "doing anything" but is the quiet that keeps one going. Like making love to one's husband, it is not something that is often seen as being as "useful" like working in a business or doing public charity.
Ironically,
a lot of the 'traditional' types hate the place too: Probably because a
really rabid guy who printed "ain't it awful" stuff for the right wing
catholic publications did an expose of it back in the 1980's...the expose exaggerated trivial problems so much
that it convinced me to go myself and see what was going on.
And I found it a place of grace.
If you have money, go visit.
But what do I know? I'm not a "churchy" type.
A lot of the opposition is politics of course. The parish involved was run by Franciscans, who
stayed there during the Ottoman days, and are beloved. The Bishop is
trying to throw them out and replace them with his own priests, and this feud has made him decide it's a fraud...part of it also seems to be that he believed a lot of disinformation given to
him by the old communist government to support his dislike of the so
called apparition.
Yet one does wonder what was the bishop's sense of proportion.
So, in the middle of the Yugoslavian
civil war, when thousands were being killed or ethnically cleansed, and the
churches in Mostar were being destroyed and the Muslims there under
fire, the local bishops were asked what was the local church's biggest
problem, and they said it was the apparition, not the hatred on all
sides killing people. Sigh.
One of the objections of
the rabid traditionalist catholic guy I cited was that Mary told one of
the women that a local Muslim neighbor was a saint: And that all of
those seeking god were her children. That put his knickers in a knot: How dare anyone suggest that other religions can lead people to god!
(catholics say other religions are partly true, so can lead people to god, but that Jesus, via grace, saves them. We pre vatican II folks call this "baptism of desire", meaning they might not be christians with every dot and jiggle correct, but they wanted to serve the deity, so are given that grace. Bible thumpers can refer to Matthew 25 where a lot of people get into heaven even though they admit they didn't "know" Jesus)
So if one thinks that Mary says catholicism isn't true, well, not really. Outsiders might not recognize what she was saying is that killing people because they aren't of your religion is a no no.
This did not sit well with fundamentalists or career church men who see organizational church as important.
Sigh.
Ironically, in the early 1990s our local Catholic bishop in Pennsylvania opposed us from going there.
His lack of action on priests who were openly gay or even hitting at young teenagers was notorious. Coincidence?
When I lived in that area, he bragged there were no more problems with his priests: Yet a nurse cried on my shoulder that her husband had been asked to "intervene" with a family so that they would not report a "visiting" priest who had molested their 13 year old boy. And my gay friends laughed at him because they knew all those priests who they met in the gay scene in Pittsburgh. I even remember an article in the local newspaper which promoted a gay friendly ministry at a local state university which has since been in the headlines after a notorious abuser associated with the university was finally prosecuted.
And that doesn't even include the hippie priest who ran away with the catechist (our pastor just sighed and said: At least it was with a woman)...
So this bishop openly advised us to "obey" the local bishop and not visit there on pilgrimage, and forbad any local priests to go with us. (he also tried to shut down the local charismatic groups, and tried to get rid of art in the churches: Some of this was stopped by local groups because they got the eastern European churches listed as architectural heritage sites).
So we went there with the local Russian Orthodox prayer group, which had that bishop's permission.
Ha.
It is interesting that this prayer group included many catholics, in a town with several Catholic churches that were dying up in membership due to the pedophilia scandals (people refused to give them money in collection, and many just stopped going).
And strangely, this Russian Orthodox church was one of two churches (the other a holiness church) that were desecrated by satanic signs and mutilated animals, almost as if someone "knew" these two small obscure churches were "dangerous" to those with evil intentions.
Sigh.
and is it a coincidence that the letter noted that the original request was made by
a German bishop who was "kicked upstairs" to the Vatican after reinstating a pedophile?
PDF.
End of Rant.