removed from my main blog.
Stuff that the MSM rarely notices as the back story on gay marriage: That the State Dept push for "gay rights" is angering a lot of Africans and Asians, because there is a long history of sexual exploitation in colonial times.
I won't even go into the idea that having sex with women was considered normal for the Brits etc. Think of all those male fantasies of beautiful Asian women who love to have sex with them, no strings attached... Madam Butterfly is one of the few stories that show that the women are not mindless happy sex workers but are human beings.
And the dirty little secret is that the UK sent their "problem sons" to the colonies. Heck, I don't even have to go to colonial times: I see my step son serially abusing his male employees. He insists they are all "consenting adults" which mean they are poor and agree because they don't want to lose the job because they are supporting their families in the Visayas. And it's not just consensual relationships: One boy is still traumatized because he was raped, and my step son admits to raping another one who passed out at a party at the farm, but who later agreed to a relationship for money.
When Lolo was dying, it took Angie to pressure them to allow the first boy to stay here to help me lift Lolo during the night...(he agreed only when I pointed out the spare bedroom was locked and next to our room).
So where was his son? Upstairs, spending the remainder of Lolo's money to fix up and decorate a store room into a love nest for him and his latest squeeze: Who he made the new "supervisor" at the farm.
So I had to go into my savings to bury Lolo, even though three months earlier, the last time I checked his savings account, there was enough money in his savings to do so...
-------------------
So yes, I am "homophobic" because the picture of happy gays doesn't include discussions of faithfulness.
Yes, most lesbians are faithful, and about half of gays are fairly faithful, but it is taboo to point out that the "gay marriage" propaganda is sending a green light for doing anything to gays who hid their temptations and rarely gave into them.
and since kids are taught safe sex and not purity and faithfulness, they can't see the problem since they are taught heterosexual promiscuity is okay too.
here is the stuff from my other blog:
It didn't start with "gay marriage".
NewBooks podcast reviews a book on those behind the sexual revolution and the marketing of the birth control pill.
No, I doubt I'll read the book, but from the review I wonder if they left things out.
Did they mention Sanger's involvement with the Eugenics movement? Sanger wasn't just preaching feminism and free love but supported the eugenics movement, that back then saw the Irish and Jews in the slums as inferior beings who shouldn't breed. But never mind. Whitewashing history is not new here.
And the very Catholic Rock was not working against the church, but hoping that the pill would allow Catholic women to space babies more efficiently, since it was not interfering with natural sex like mechanical methods.
That is why Humana Vitae was such a bummer: Most Catholics agreed with Rock, seeing that the pill only lengthened the infertile period so rhythm would work better.
the irony? Most of what Paul VI warned about contraception destroying families has come true....
and when Obama's State Dept pushes the gay agenda on third world countries, he fails to see that this doesn't mean two equal and affluent gays who are faithful to each other, but translates to sex tourism.
=========
related item:
The Diplomad posts
a photo from the US embassy in the Dominican Republic to celebrate gay marriage.
ah, but are these men in a faithful relationships? or are they partying? The side effect of gay marriage is not faithful relationships, but what the Pope has called "cultural imperialism", which in poor countries means exploiting the vulnerable.
even though prostitution is legal in the DR, nevertheless
30 thousand street kids, one third of them boys, are pressured by poverty and/or thugs into becoming "sex workers"
which is why many poor countries see the US push to change sexual traditions is seen as just one more way to exploit them and their children.
There is a long history of this: Male rape of employees in Africa during colonial times, in "all male" dormitories, by Islamic slave traders, and in the various civil wars is so far an uncovered story, since the subject is taboo there due to the deep humiliation felt by the men...
and although most folks know that many tourists here are sex tourists, what few mention is that this is a major site for gay tourism too. The real wonder is that there is so little HIV here (probably the Tuli). But that doesn't stop the population control thugs from lamenting about that evil Catholic church not letting them use condoms (which can be bought in the local grocery stores and pharmacies, even here in the provinces, but never mind).
Putin is using Obama's cluessness to push Russia as the defender of Christendom,...and a lot of the power of his arguments will be the pain of those exploited sexually by Obama's policies...
And don't forget the Middle Eastern Christians being ignored and allowed to die.
The long history behind this is Moscow as the third Rome, and the religious and moral subtexts will be completely overlooked by the highly secular MSM.
Ironically, one of the early prophecies of Medjugoje was that Russia would become a defender of Christianity and that the west would become proud due to technological progress... this was before the iron curtain came down...yet now, to the very religious it seems that maybe there is truth in the matter.
But of course, the far left and far right in the Catholic church all insist it is a fake vision, so ignore that prediction: it will never happen.
-----------------------------------
Youtube Lecture of the week: Mark Wilson has a series on women in antiquity.
LINK
I am also listening to a
Russian history class there.
you know what? Ivan the terrible was really terrible...
-----------------------
and the very very bad news of the day:
OH NO!
pop-less bubble wrap.